Drawing for DIDEEP

USPTO serial 88525993

DIDEEP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KLUWE, CHERYL D
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DIDEEP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Buoyancy compensator jacket for use in scuba diving; Diving equipment, namely, helmets; Diving equipment, namely, protective diving shoes; Diving gloves; Diving goggles; Diving snorkels; Diving suits; Face masks for diving; Free diving weights to offset the buoyancy of a user's wetsuit; Skin diving masks; Underwater breathing apparatusABANDONEDApr 28, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 13, 2025WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED
Oct 13, 2025WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED
Jun 9, 2020MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Jun 9, 2020ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Jun 9, 2020OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Jun 9, 2020OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Jan 21, 2020OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Jan 21, 2020OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB
Dec 24, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Dec 24, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 4, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Nov 18, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 14, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 7, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 6, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 6, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 16, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 31, 2019MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED
Jul 30, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 24, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance