USPTO serial 88526868
PVKZUC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 610
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PVKZUC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Abrasive sponges for scrubbing the skin; Barbecue mitts; Candy boxes; Cosmetic brushes; Eyebrow brushes; Feeding troughs; Gloves for household purposes; Saucers; Scrubbing brushes; Soap holders; Tea balls; Toothpick holders; Vacuum bottles; Vases; Non-metal piggy banks | TERMINATED | Jun 5, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2022 | KNOT | NOTICE OF TERMINATION – EMAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2022 | KBOC | TERMINATED AFTER SANCTIONS | — |
| Aug 11, 2022 | KONO | ORDER FOR SANCTIONS - NOTICE EMAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2022 | KOFS | ORDER FOR SANCTIONS | — |
| Jul 6, 2022 | KSNR | NOTICE OF SUSPENSION EMAILED - PENDING SCO | — |
| Jul 6, 2022 | KSAD | SUSPENDED PENDING ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW | — |
| Jun 30, 2022 | KSCO | SHOW CAUSE ORDER | — |
| Jan 12, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 20, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 12, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |