Drawing for DESI FRESH FOODS

USPTO serial 88527026

DESI FRESH FOODS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WILSON, MARYNELLE WEST
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DESI FRESH FOODS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ABIGAIL RUBINSTEIN

ABIGAIL RUBINSTEIN MCDERMOTT WILL AND EMERY340 MADISON AVENEW YORK CITY, NY 10173-1922UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Yogurt drinks, namely, lassi; dairy products, namely shrikhand, prepackaged refrigerated meals comprised primarily of yogurt, cheese, and paneerACTIVE
030Refrigerated pre-prepared desserts, namely, gulab jamun, ras malai and gajar halwaACTIVE
032Fruit juicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2021MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Nov 15, 2021ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Nov 15, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Sep 27, 2021EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Jul 12, 2021GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jul 12, 2021GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jul 12, 2021CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Jun 1, 2021ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Jun 1, 2021EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jun 1, 2021JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jun 1, 2021EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
May 24, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 2, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Dec 2, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 2, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 10, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 9, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 9, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 7, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 17, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 17, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 17, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 30, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 25, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance