USPTO serial 88528065
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Barstools; Bookcases; Cat scratching posts; Chair beds; Chair cushions; Computer furniture; Deck chairs; Dining chairs; Dining room tables; Dining tables; End tables; Folding tables; Furniture for house, office and garden; Lawn furniture; Massage tables; Night tables; Occasional tables; Office armchairs; Office chairs; Office desks; Office furniture; Office tables; Ottoman seats; Ottomans; Patio furniture; Reclining armchairs; Reclining chairs; Rocking chairs; Scratching posts for cats; Sofa beds; Stools; Tea tables; Collapsible platform seats and stools; Ergonomic chairs for use in seated massages; Fishing stools; Foot stools; Furniture primarily of metal, namely, mirrors, bed frames, dining tables, coffee tables, end tables, desks, display cases, shelving, dog gates, and baby gates; Living room furniture; Non-metal step stools; Portable folding stadium seats; Step stools, not of metal | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2023 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 11, 2023 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 11, 2023 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 11, 2023 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 9, 2023 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 11, 2023 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 22, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2023 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2023 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2022 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 11, 2022 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 8, 2022 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Aug 8, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 11, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 16, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 29, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 8, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |