Drawing for 0+1

USPTO serial 88528065

0+1

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CAHILL, CLARE GALLAGHER
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with 0+1?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Barstools; Bookcases; Cat scratching posts; Chair beds; Chair cushions; Computer furniture; Deck chairs; Dining chairs; Dining room tables; Dining tables; End tables; Folding tables; Furniture for house, office and garden; Lawn furniture; Massage tables; Night tables; Occasional tables; Office armchairs; Office chairs; Office desks; Office furniture; Office tables; Ottoman seats; Ottomans; Patio furniture; Reclining armchairs; Reclining chairs; Rocking chairs; Scratching posts for cats; Sofa beds; Stools; Tea tables; Collapsible platform seats and stools; Ergonomic chairs for use in seated massages; Fishing stools; Foot stools; Furniture primarily of metal, namely, mirrors, bed frames, dining tables, coffee tables, end tables, desks, display cases, shelving, dog gates, and baby gates; Living room furniture; Non-metal step stools; Portable folding stadium seats; Step stools, not of metalABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 11, 2023MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Sep 11, 2023ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Sep 11, 2023OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Sep 11, 2023OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Jun 9, 2023OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
May 11, 2023ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Apr 11, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Apr 11, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 22, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Mar 6, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 1, 2023NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Mar 1, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 1, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 1, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 1, 2023PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Mar 1, 2023PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Feb 22, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 22, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 22, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 17, 2022ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 11, 2022LOPRLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN
Oct 8, 2022LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED
Aug 8, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 30, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 29, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 24, 2022ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
May 31, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
May 11, 2022GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
May 11, 2022GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
May 11, 2022CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Apr 25, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Aug 16, 2021GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Aug 16, 2021GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Aug 16, 2021CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Aug 7, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 7, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 2, 2021ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Feb 1, 2021GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Feb 1, 2021GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Feb 1, 2021CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Jan 29, 2021RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jun 29, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 29, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 29, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jun 26, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 26, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 22, 2020ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
May 12, 2020GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
May 12, 2020GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
May 12, 2020CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
May 8, 2020RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Apr 28, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 9, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Oct 9, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Oct 9, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Oct 9, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 31, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 25, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance