Drawing for CHUROU

USPTO serial 88528526

CHUROU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 973
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WHEATLEY, TRAVIS DWIGHT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 128

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHUROU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

/Abraham Lichy/

222 East 68th Street,New York, NY 10065UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Bow ties; Denim pants; Pashmina shawls; Pyjamas; Slippers; Veils; Women's clothing, namely, shirts, dresses, skirts, blouses; Women's hats and hoodsACTIVESep 15, 2018

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 1, 2022KSNSNOTICE OF SUSPENSION EMAILED - ADMIN REVIEW
Sep 1, 2022KSADSUSPENDED PENDING ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
Jul 2, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 30, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 30, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 20, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 11, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Jun 11, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jun 11, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jun 3, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 2, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 22, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 22, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 11, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 31, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 25, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance