Drawing for BIOVISION

USPTO serial 88557705

BIOVISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LARKEY, MICHAEL M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BIOVISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jacob Ong

Jacob Ong ONGS LAW FIRM PLLCPO BOX 403LEHI, UT 84043UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Recorded software for performing video analytics and signal processing of human biometrics or animal biometricsACTIVEFeb 6, 2020

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 29, 2021MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
Jul 29, 2021ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
Feb 25, 2021RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED
Feb 25, 2021RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED
Feb 25, 2021RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED
Feb 8, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 8, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 4, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 30, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Oct 23, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Oct 23, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 23, 2020CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 16, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 16, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 16, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 1, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2020CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2020SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Feb 28, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Feb 6, 2020IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Feb 6, 2020EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Feb 4, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 10, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Dec 10, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 20, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Oct 31, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 30, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 16, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 5, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance