USPTO serial 88576936
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Vancouver, B.C., CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carl E. Jennison
Carl E. Jennison JENNISON & SHULTZ, P.C.3918 Prosperity Avenue, Suite 215Fairfax, VA 22031United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | food products namely cheese; Food products namely: Canned vegetables, preserved vegetables, Canned fruit, preserved fruit, Canned peas, Dried beans, canned baked beans, pre-packaged meals and appetizers consisting primarily of: Bangers and mash, Shepherd's pie, Fish and chips, Roast pork, Roast beef, Beef stew, Scotch eggs, Steak and kidney pie, Bubble and squeak (cabbage and potato patties), Liver and onions, cheese, jams and jellies, clotted cream. | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | food products, namely, chocolates cookies Food products namely: Biscuits, Pastries, Scones, Bread pudding, Jam rolls, Christmas pudding, Trifle, Sticky toffee pudding, Rice pudding, Treacle tarts, apple sauce, sweet Yorkshire pudding, sweet Cornish pasties, Tea, | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2026 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2026 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2026 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 20, 2026 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2026 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2026 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2025 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2025 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Aug 25, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 20, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2024 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2024 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2024 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 15, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 9, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 4, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 6, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 19, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 19, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 20, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |