USPTO serial 88611489
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R Menker
James R Menker HOLLEY & MENKER, PAPO BOX 331937ATLANTIC BEACH, FL 32233UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Scraping tools, namely, paint scrapers; hand tools, namely, engravers; hand tools for use in carving pumpkins, mini-pumpkins, gourds, and other fruits and vegetables, namely, knives, saws, scoops, chisels and drills; scissors | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Nightlights, namely, electric night lights and battery-operated night lights | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Baby carriages, baby strollers, infant car seats | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | School supplies, namely, colored pencils, wax crayons, markers and coloring felt pens and markers, glue for stationery and household purposes, notebooks, erasers; plastic art supplies, namely, paints gouaches, sealers, primers, varnishes, solvents, inks and watercolors, drawing pens, paintbrushes, pencils and pastels, charcoals, drawing pencils and sketches, colored pencils, wax crayons, markers, coloring felts; Calligraphy materials, namely, calligraphy pens, calligraphy writing brushes, calligraphy paper and calligraphy ink; paper and cardboard for dry and wet products, sketchbooks and shelves for sketches, cutouts and drawings, canvases, frames, scraping tools and engraving, linocut and silkscreen printing, modeling pastes, cookie cutters and accessories; Molding materials, namely, latex, plaster, papier mâché, clays and carving tools; tools, yarn and netting, scissors and knives, glues | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Picture frames; furniture, namely, storage cabinets, mobile workstations having multi-use work surfaces for use in a wide variety of fields, magnetic tables, work tables, chests, serving trolleys, tables, stools, chairs, cushions, shelves, bookcases, mirrors, armchairs, non-metal bins, beds, mattresses, benches, cabinets; furniture for infants, namely, high chairs, booster chairs, beds, changing tables, hygiene and safety equipment, namely, non-metal safety gates for infants; infant walkers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 2, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 2, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 29, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 19, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 3, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 26, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |