Drawing for LIPPY

USPTO serial 88618356

LIPPY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CORNWELL, ANDREA B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIPPY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Blake T. Dietrich

Blake T. Dietrich JACKSON WALKER LLP2323 ROSS AVENUESUITE 600DALLAS, TX 75201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Men's and women's apparel and clothing, namely, trousers, leggings, skirts, shorts, shirts, sweaters, dresses, vests, jackets, coats, overalls, scarves, shawls, underwear, socks, stockings, gloves, visors being headwear, caps being headwear, hats, boots, sandals, slippers, pumps, sports shoes, men's and women's athletic wear, namely, sweatpants, sweatshirts, t-shirts, tights, track suitsACTIVE
035Advertising services, namely, promoting and marketing men's and women's apparel and clothing including trousers, leggings, skirts, shirts, sweaters, dresses, vests, jackets, coats, overalls, scarves, shawls, athletic wear, underwear, socks, stockings, gloves, visors, caps, hats, boots, sandals, slippers, pumps, sports shoes and the likeACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 4, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 2, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 21, 2021ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Oct 8, 2020ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Sep 8, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Sep 8, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 19, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 4, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 20, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 20, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 19, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 7, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Jul 6, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 6, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jul 6, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jul 6, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 6, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 18, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 24, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 19, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance