USPTO serial 88631806
IONIC MACHINA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GUROK, GALINA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IONIC MACHINA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel Sineway
DANIEL SINEWAY MORRIS, MANNING & MARTIN, LLP3343 PEACHTREE RD NE1600 ATLANTA FINANCIAL CENTERATLANTA, GA 30326Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for encryption and decoding of data and files; computer software platforms for data protection and privacy; downloadable computer software that enables searching of encrypted data and files; downloadable computer software for data usage analytics and visibility; downloadable software for use by others for identity and credential management, application rights management, encryption key management, and logging and auditing management; downloadable software for providing software development kits and application programmable interfaces for developers | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Data usage analytics and visibility services, namely, business data analysis; providing search engine services for encrypted data | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Data encryption and decoding services; software-as-a-service (SaaS) services for encryption and decoding of data and files; providing online, non-downloadable software for encryption and decoding; software-as-a-service (SaaS) services in the field of data protection and privacy; providing online, non-downloadable software in the field of data usage analytics and visibility; providing online, non-downloadable software for identity and credential management, application rights management, encryption key management, and logging and auditing management; provision of software development kits and application programmable interfaces (APIs) for developers; computer security services, namely, enforcing, restricting, and controlling access privileges of users of computing resources for cloud, mobile, or network resources based on assigned credentials or policies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |