USPTO serial 88669914
FRANK WHITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FRANK WHITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher M. Wheeler
Christopher M. Wheeler FRAMEWORK LAW GROUP PC1275 E 6TH STREET, SUITE 8ALOS ANGELES, CA 90021UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Alloys of precious metal; Badges of precious metal; Beads for making jewelry; Boxes of precious metal; Bracelets; Cases being parts of watches and clocks; Charms for jewelry; Clocks; Clocks and watches; Clockworks being clock parts; Cloisonné jewelry; Cuff links; Diamonds; Earrings; Figurines of precious metal; Gold; Gold thread jewelry; Ingots of precious metals; Iridium; Jewelry; Key rings; Lockets; Medals; Movements for clocks and watches; Necklaces; Olivine; Ornamental lapel pins; Ornaments of jet; Ornaments of precious metal in the nature of jewelry; Osmium; Palladium; Paste jewelry; Pearls; Platinum; Precious metals; Precious stones; Rhodium; Rings; Ruthenium; Semi-precious stones; Silver thread jewelry; Silver, unwrought or beaten; Statues of precious metal; Stopwatches; Threads of precious metal; Tie clips; Tie pins; Watch bands; Watch cases being parts of watches; Watch chains; Watch glasses; Watch springs; Watches; Works of art of precious metal; Wristwatches; Clock dials; Clock and watchmaking pendulums; Collectible coins; Jewelry brooches; Jewelry chains; Lapel pins | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 29, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 28, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 15, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2022 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 2, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2022 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 2, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 30, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 26, 2022 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 31, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |