USPTO serial 88719470
FERRET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHMIDT, JOHN JOSEPH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FERRET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew Morabito
PO BOX 187EAST ROCHESTER, NY 14445UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Abrading tools; Apparatus for tattooing; Beard clippers; Crimping irons; Curling tongs; Depilation appliances, electric and non-electric; Ear piercing apparatus; Electric hair curling irons; Eyelash curlers; Fingernail polishers, electric or non-electric; Hair-removing tweezers; Hair clippers for personal use, electric and non-electric; Hair clippers for personal use; Hand-operated cutting tools; Hand-operated riveting tools; Hand-operated tools, namely, chisels; Hand tools, namely, adzes; Hand tools, namely, augers; Hand tools, namely, dies; Hand tools, namely, hand-operated pumps; Hand tools, namely, loppers; Hand tools, namely, nippers; Hand tools, namely, pikes; Hand tools, namely, pruners; Hand tools, namely, punches; Hand tools, namely, spokeshaves; Hand tools, namely, squares; Hand tools, namely, tampers; Hand tools, namely, taps; Hand tools, namely, transplanters; Hand tools, namely, wedges; Manicure sets; Manicure sets, electric; Nail clippers, electric or non-electric; Nail files; Nail files, electric; Pedicure sets; Razor blades; Razor cases; Razors, electric or non-electric; Sharpening stones; Shaving cases; Non-electric curling irons | ACTIVE | Nov 7, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |