CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SHIELDMASTER

USPTO serial 88722728

SHIELDMASTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHIELDMASTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cheryl L. Greenly

35500 Chester RoadAvon, OH 44011UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promotional marketing and representation services for sales to original equipment manufacturers, dealers of vehicles and aftermarket parts distributors in the field of commercial vehicle brake and electronic vehicle safety system products, namely, adaptive cruise control, collision mitigation, vehicle data recorders and lane departure warning systemsACTIVE—
037Technical support services, namely, providing in-person technical advice in the field of maintenance of commercial vehicle brake and electronic vehicle safety system products, namely, adaptive cruise control, collision mitigation, vehicle data recorders and lane departure warning systemsACTIVE—
041Providing in-person and on-line training seminars in the field of application, use and maintenance and replacement of commercial vehicle brake and electronic vehicle safety system products, namely, adaptive cruise control, collision mitigation, vehicle data recorders and lane departure warning systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 21, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 29, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 28, 2022EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 28, 2022AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 9, 2022EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 9, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 7, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2022EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 5, 2022EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 5, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 18, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2022EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 14, 2022EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 14, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 22, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2021EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 18, 2021EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 18, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 12, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 8, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 8, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 21, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 26, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 26, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 6, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 14, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 14, 2020XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2020GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2020GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2020CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 13, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 11, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 18, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance