CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for JERUSALEM

USPTO serial 88760198

JERUSALEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REINHART, MEGHAN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JERUSALEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

FRANCIS JOHN CIARAMELLA

FRANCIS JOHN CIARAMELLA FRANCIS JOHN CIARAMELLA, PLLC110 FRONT STREET SUITE 300JUPITER, FL 33477UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, T-shirts and HatsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 21, 2022MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 17, 2022ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 17, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 30, 2022EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 18, 2021GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2021GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2021CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Oct 27, 2021JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 20, 2021GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2021GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2021CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 19, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 18, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 16, 2021ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2021EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 16, 2021JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 16, 2021EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 16, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 16, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 16, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 28, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 28, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 30, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 29, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 29, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 24, 2020MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance