Drawing for PRONTO.AI

USPTO serial 88761326

PRONTO.AI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OPUTA, CHIOMA N
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRONTO.AI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven A. Abreu

Steven A. Abreu Sunstein LLP100 High StreetBoston, MA 02110United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Computer installation services for autonomous driving; installation, maintenance and repair of computer hardware for autonomous driving; installation services, namely, installation of computer equipment parts into motor vehicles for autonomous driving and advanced driver-assistance systems; vehicle customization services, namely, installation of necessary electronic and other equipment into vehicles in order to support autonomous driving technologyACTIVE—
042Computer programming for autonomous driving; design, engineering and technological consultancy services relating to safety and optimization for motor vehicles, safety and optimization for motor vehicle parts, the autonomous driving systems, and advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS), and components; research, development, design and upgrading of computer software and computer systems for autonomous driving; research, development, design and upgrading services in the field of safety and optimization for motor vehicles, autonomous driving and advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS); design, maintenance and update of computer software for use in the automotive industry for autonomous driving; Software as a Service (SaaS) featuring software for autonomous driving and advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS); design and development of devices, instruments and equipment for wireless data transmission for use in the autonomous driving and advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) fieldsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 1, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 1, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 12, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 2023EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 30, 2023EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 30, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 8, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2023NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2023EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 7, 2023DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 27, 2023AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 27, 2023EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 27, 2023DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2023ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 2, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2022EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 29, 2022EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 29, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 3, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2022EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 28, 2022EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 28, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 31, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 22, 2021ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jun 30, 2021CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2021APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jun 14, 2021EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2021ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 23, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 10, 2020XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2020GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2020GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2020CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 9, 2020ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 10, 2020PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Oct 29, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 28, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 27, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 27, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 2, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 15, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 22, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 20, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance