USPTO serial 88776315
HOLD'EM + 3
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FALK, ERIN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOLD'EM + 3?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark C. Johnson
Mark C. Johnson JOHNSON | DALAL111 N. PINE ISLAND ROAD, SUITE 103PLANTATION, FL 33324UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Electronic game playing apparatus for casino games; Game tables; Game tables for playing poker-based wagering games; Poker room style wagering games having random game events for players to place side wagers on, offered at wagering game tables in gaming establishments; casino card games for gaming purposes in the nature of poker-based wagering games offering various house-banked wagering opportunities and side games played in poker rooms; house-banked side wagering games offered with an underlying poker-based card game played in poker rooms; Casino poker style card games for social and real money gaming; casino card games; Gaming tables | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2022 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 18, 2022 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |