USPTO serial 88796825
CHIEF APOLOGY OFFICER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BURCH, JILLIAN RENEE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHIEF APOLOGY OFFICER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah A. Gubernick
Deborah A. Gubernick SNELL & WILMER LLP600 ANTON BLVD.SUITE 1400COSTA MESA, CA 92626Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing software as a service (SAAS) to measure, prioritize, and optimize the customer, product, employee and brand responses, and to display relevant concurrences using statistically driven data sets; Software as a service (SAAS) in the fields of business research, academic research, healthcare research, market research, market development and market growth, consumer research and customer satisfaction surveys, product research, brand research and concept testing surveys, employee evaluations and feedback surveys, all to measure, prioritize, and optimize the customer, product, employee and brand responses, and to display relevant concurrences using statistically driven data sets; Software as a service (SAAS) for designing, conducting and analyzing surveys, survey data and consumer feedback; Software as a service (SAAS) for providing and creating analytics to assist in the management, tracking and application of survey and contact data; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software accessed via the Internet in the field of business, academic, healthcare and market research, analysis, surveys, customer research, demographics, product and brand development, employee engagement, employee management, employee development and employer-employee relationships, all to measure, prioritize, and optimize the customer, product, employee and brand responses, and to display relevant concurrences using statistically driven data sets; providing software as a service (SAAS), accessed via the Internet and offline featuring software for contact information, data feedback, data evaluation, and research surveys, data collection, data integration, data management, data analysis, follow-up to survey responses and generating reports for use in consulting with respect thereto; computer services, namely, hosting and maintaining an on-line web site and web facilities for others for conducting consumer surveys, employee surveys and business research and analyzing resulting data; providing information online in the field of product development and product testing; Computer website design, namely, design of education and entertainment blogs; Advising and consulting in connection with the design, customization and analysis of product research | ACTIVE | May 3, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2021 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2021 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 16, 2021 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2021 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 12, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 22, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 28, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 8, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |