Drawing for POWERZONE

USPTO serial 88796957

POWERZONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MCMORROW, RONALD G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POWERZONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BRADLEY L. COHN

BRADLEY L. COHN PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, HILLIARD & GERALDS200 S. WACKER DRIVE, SUITE 2900CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Shower headsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 14, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jul 14, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jul 12, 2023ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jul 12, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Apr 28, 2023EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Feb 6, 2023RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES
Jan 13, 2023GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Jan 13, 2023GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Jan 13, 2023CNESSU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN
Nov 14, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Sep 10, 2022GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Sep 10, 2022GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Sep 10, 2022CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN
Aug 10, 2022EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Aug 10, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Aug 10, 2022EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Aug 9, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 9, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 9, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Feb 10, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Feb 10, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 10, 2022CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 20, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 20, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 20, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2021CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 19, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 16, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 18, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 2, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2021CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 18, 2021SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Feb 18, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 18, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Feb 4, 2021IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Feb 4, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 4, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 4, 2021EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 4, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 9, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jun 9, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 20, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Apr 30, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 30, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 19, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 17, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance