Drawing for HUMAN INTERFACE DESIGN

USPTO serial 88823444

HUMAN INTERFACE DESIGN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HUMAN INTERFACE DESIGN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gene Bolmarcich

Gene Bolmarcich LAW OFFICES OF GENE BOLMARCICH107 NORTH LAKE SHORE DRIVEBROOKFIELD, CT 06804

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for controlling the execution and functionality of other software or software of which it is an integral component; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for enterprise resource planning, which includes managing workplace, businesses, enterprises and corporate environments via means of interactive software modules to oversee its accounting, finance, manufacturing, inventory maintenance and costing, operations, sales recording and invoicing, reports including costs of goods, operational expenses, balance sheets, financial statements and profit and loss, customer resource management, intra office communication and management; A software based feature, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for improving user interfaces and for improving the efficiency of a software module's output and for optimizing the overall throughput for the software moduleACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 10, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 18, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 17, 2023EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jan 9, 2023NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Jan 9, 2023TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Jan 9, 2023PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jan 9, 2023PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jan 9, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 8, 2022EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Aug 11, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Aug 10, 2022EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Aug 8, 2022AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jul 20, 2022NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Jul 19, 2022TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Jul 19, 2022PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jul 19, 2022PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jul 11, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 11, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2022EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Nov 24, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 22, 2021EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Nov 22, 2021EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Nov 22, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 4, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 2, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 2, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 2, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 8, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 13, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 13, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 23, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Sep 9, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 9, 2020XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Sep 9, 2020GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Sep 9, 2020GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Sep 9, 2020CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 27, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 27, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 27, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 26, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 4, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 4, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 19, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 29, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 29, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Jun 28, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jun 28, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 28, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 10, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 10, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 10, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 29, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 13, 2020MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED
Mar 12, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 10, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance