USPTO serial 88837157
ACU-INSERTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WOLD,BARBARA NIELSEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ACU-INSERTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Chen
David Chen IP ATTORNEYS GROUP, LLC16 OXFORD ROADMILFORD, CT 06460United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Acupuncture instruments; acupuncture equipment; apparatus for acupuncture therapy, namely, apparatus for guiding the insertion of an acupuncture needle into a subject | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 17, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 16, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 15, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Apr 9, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |