USPTO serial 88853309
SIGNIFLOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEELEY, ALISON REBECCA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SIGNIFLOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laura M. Konkel
Laura M. Konkel MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP790 N. Water Street, Ste. 2500MILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software, namely, digital signature software, digital signature workflow software, electronic data verification and management software, software to facilitate the execution of legally binding electronic signatures, software for automating and systematizing contract execution, software for electronic document exchange and management, and software for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, transmission, storage, and sharing of data and information | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2019 |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring digital signature software, digital signature workflow software, electronic data verification and management software, software to facilitate the execution of legally binding electronic signatures, software for automating and systematizing contract execution, software for electronic document exchange and management, and software for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, transmission, storage, and sharing of data and information | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2022 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 10, 2022 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2022 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 21, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 19, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 22, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |