USPTO serial 88927794
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Vancouver, BC, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brent Capehart
BRENT CAPEHART PALMER IP INC.704-1478 WEST HASTINGS STREETVANCOUVER, BC, V6G3J6CANADA| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Gummy candy; Candies; Confectionery fruit jellies; Fruit-based confectionery; Fruit jelly candy; Sugar-free candies; Low sugar gummy candy; Sweets in the form of candy; Chocolates; Marshmallows; Hard candy; Low sugar hard candy; Chocolate confectionery; Chocolate candies; Candy-coated nuts; Mint for confectionery; Candy mints; Chocolate covered nuts; Chocolate covered fruits; Peppermint candy; Toffee candies; Toffee; Low sugar taffy; Taffy candies; Caramels; Chewing gum; Sugar-free chewing gum; Sugarless chewing gum; Bubble gum; Low sugar candies including licorice, panned candy, candy twists, sour candy straws and licorice laces; Sugarless candies; Sugar-free gummies; Sugarless gummies; Sugar-free jellies; Sugarless jellies; Candy-coated fruits | ACTIVE | Jan 7, 2020 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 26, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |