USPTO serial 88975573
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Wilmington, DE, US
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas Dunlap
Thomas Dunlap Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC211 Church Street SELeesburg, VA 20175United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | (Based on Intent to Use) Statistical analysis and reporting services for business purposes; Statistical evaluations of marketing data; Compiling and analyzing statistics for audience rating determination for television broadcasts; advertising; business management; business administration; collection, systematization, compilation and economic analysis of data and information in computer databases; Tracking and monitoring users preferences and actions interpretation for business purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | (Based on 44(e)) (Based on Use in Commerce) Television broadcasting; Broadcasting, webcasting, streaming, and transmission of audio, video, subscription television, and video-on-demand content via the internet and electronic communications networks; television broadcasting to mobile devices, namely, mobile phones, tablets, set-top boxes, game consoles and personal computers; telecommunication services, namely, transmission of voice, data, images, graphics, audio, video, and multimedia by means of wired and wireless networks; providing access to online forums for transmission of messages among service users; video-on-demand transmission services; Telecommunication services, namely, transmission of text, video, audio information, web pages and hyperlinks, forms, interactive elements for informational support or informational enhancement of video content by means of telecommunications networks, wireless communication networks, and the Internet | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2017 |
| 041 | (Based on 44(e)) Entertainment services, namely, providing ongoing television programs in the field of movies, music, comedy, sports, adventure and travel, action, culinary, current events, news, documentaries and animation via a global computer network; Entertainment services, namely, an ongoing series featuring music, movies, comedy, sports, adventure and travel, action, documentaries and animation provided through Over-the-top /OTT/ services; Entertainment services, namely, video-on-demand television programs featuring movies, music, comedy, sports, adventure and travel, action, documentaries and animation provided through Over-the-top /OTT/ services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2026 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jul 27, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2024 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2024 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2024 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 14, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2024 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 24, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 20, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 15, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2019 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2018 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |