USPTO serial 88976243
LIVECATCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KLUWE, CHERYL D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIVECATCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Phillip Thomas Horton
Phillip Thomas Horton HORTON LAW, PLLC736 WEST STATE STREET736 WEST STATE STREET, F301FARMINGTON, UT 84025Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Clam juice; Clams, not live; Clams, not live; Fish and chips; Fish and meat preserves; Fish burger patties; Fish cakes; Fish fillets; Fish, not live; Fish, preserved; Fish, tinned; Frozen pre-packaged entrees consisting primarily of seafood; Frozen seafood; Frozen shellfish; Lobsters, not live; Prawns, not live; Prawns, not live; Seafood, not live; Shrimp chips; Shrimp, not live; Shrimps, not live; Boiled and dried fish; Canned fish; Coconut shrimp; Confit in the nature of a cooked seafood based spread; Dried fish; Dried prawns; Dried seafood; Dried shrimps; Edible oils and fats, fish and meat preserves; Frozen fish; Marinated seafood; Marranitas, namely, green plantain shaped into balls filled with fried potatoes, chicken, beef or shrimp; Meat, fish, poultry and game, not live; Pickled fish; Prepared and prepackaged meals and entrees consisting primarily of egg with one or more of meat, fish, poultry, vegetable, cheese or onion; Prepared entrees consisting primarily of seafood; Prepared entrées consisting primarily of lobster meat dipped in batter and fried; Prepared food kits composed of meat, poultry, fish, seafood, and/or vegetables and also including sauces or seasonings, ready for cooking and assembly as a meal; Preserved fish; Processed fish; Processed seafood; Processed seafood, namely, fish; Salted fish; Seasoned seafood; Shellfish, not live; Short-necked clams, not live; Shrimps, prawns and lobsters, not live; Smoked fish; Spiny lobsters, not live; Stuffed shrimp; Tempura seafood; Tinned seafood; Toddler meals, namely, frozen, packaged, or prepared entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; Tuna fish, not live; frozen, packaged, or prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; Fish croquettes and seafood croquettes | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Fishing bait, live; Fresh scallions; Live abalones; Live anchovies; Live animals; Live bait; Live bait for fishing; Live baits; Live carp; Live catfish; Live crabs; Live crayfish; Live crustaceans; Live cuttlefish; Live herrings; Live lobsters; Live octopuses; Live oysters; Live prawns; Live salmon; Live sardines; Live shrimp; Live snails; Live tilapia; Live trouts; Live tuna; Lobsters, live; Anchovy, live; Brine shrimp for fish food; Calamari, live; Crayfish, live; Crustaceans, live; Fish, live; Flounders, live; Herrings, live; Live clams; Live fish for food purposes; Live fishing bait; Live seafood; Live mammals, fish, birds and insects; Live short-necked clams; Live shrimps, prawns and lobsters; Mussels, live; Oysters, live; Salmon, live; Sardines, live; Sea-cucumbers, live; Sole fish, live; Spiny lobsters, live; Squid, live; Tuna, live; Fresh entrees and meals consisting primarily of fresh vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2022 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2022 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2022 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 24, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2019 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | PMSG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - MAKE SPECIAL - GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 31, 2019 | TPMS | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR-MAKE SPECIAL-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |