USPTO serial 88979412
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia L. Werner
Patricia L. Werner Kelley Drye & Warren LLP175 Greenwich Street3 World Trade CenterNew York, NY 10007| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Strategic business planning services; Business administration services; Compilation of information into computer databases; Systemization of information into computer databases; Updating and maintenance of data in computer databases; Business management services relating to information and data compiling and analyzing; Services in the field of predictive analytics, namely, analyzing and compiling business data | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Advisory and planning services relating to the optimization of water transportation and distribution systems, namely, consulting relating to routes through which water will be transported and delivered to municipalities | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 23, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jul 23, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 27, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 31, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 27, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 31, 2023 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 13, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 9, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2020 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |