Drawing for BLUEIQ

USPTO serial 88979412

BLUEIQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOPKINS, SARAH COLLEEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 123

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BLUEIQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patricia L. Werner

Patricia L. Werner Kelley Drye & Warren LLP175 Greenwich Street3 World Trade CenterNew York, NY 10007

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Strategic business planning services; Business administration services; Compilation of information into computer databases; Systemization of information into computer databases; Updating and maintenance of data in computer databases; Business management services relating to information and data compiling and analyzing; Services in the field of predictive analytics, namely, analyzing and compiling business dataACTIVE—
039Advisory and planning services relating to the optimization of water transportation and distribution systems, namely, consulting relating to routes through which water will be transported and delivered to municipalitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 12, 2025MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 12, 2025ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 23, 2025XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Jul 23, 2025XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2025GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2025GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2025CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 27, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 31, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 1, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2024ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 2, 2024GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 2, 2024GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 2, 2024CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 1, 2024RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 27, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 24, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 2023ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2023GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2023GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2023CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 8, 2023RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 31, 2023ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 15, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 14, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 8, 2022ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 13, 2022GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2022GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2022CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 18, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 4, 2021GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2021GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2021CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 1, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2021ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2021GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2021GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2021CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 11, 2021RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 9, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 27, 2020DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 26, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 11, 2020DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 4, 2020ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
May 6, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 9, 2020ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 11, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 4, 2020PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance