USPTO serial 88979451
STANDARD EXTRACTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOOK, JEFFREY J
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STANDARD EXTRACTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | Smokers articles, namely, pipes, cigarette rolling papers, cigarettes, cigars, cigarette rolling mats, tobacco grinders, lighters for smokers, flavored oils, not including essential oils, for use in refilling electronic cigarettes, vape pens and cartridges for electronic cigarettes and vape pens; flavorings other than essential oils for use in connection with smoking substances, namely, tobacco and smoking herbs; electronic cigarettes; oral smokeless vape pens; cartridges, sold empty, for electronic cigarettes and oral smokeless vape pens; electronic cigarette cartridges and oral smokeless vape pen cartridges sold prefilled with flavored oils, other than essential oils; resins in the nature of processed plant resins for use in smoking; none of the foregoing comprised of Cannabis sativa L, or any oils, extracts or derivatives thereof, or for use in connection with smoking, vaping, preparing or inhaling Cannabis sativa L, or any oils, extracts or derivatives thereof, with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) content of more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail and wholesale store services, featuring oils for smoking, clothing, cosmetic lotions, smoker's articles; none of the foregoing goods featured comprised of Cannabis sativa L, or any oils, extracts or derivatives thereof, or designed for use or primarily intended for use in smoking, vaping, preparing or inhaling Cannabis sativa L, or any oils, extracts or derivatives thereof, with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) content of more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; wholesale store services featuring oils for smoking, clothing, cosmetic lotions, smoker's articles; none of the foregoing goods featured comprised of Cannabis sativa L, or any oils, extracts or derivatives thereof, or designed for use or primarily for use in smoking, vaping, preparing or inhaling Cannabis sativa L, or any oils, extracts or derivatives thereof, with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) content of more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; Distributorship services featuring oils for smoking, clothing, cosmetic lotions, smoker's articles; none of the foregoing goods featured comprised of Cannabis sativa L, or any oils, extracts or derivatives thereof, or designed for use or primarily intended for use in smoking, vaping, preparing or inhaling Cannabis sativa L, or any oils, extracts or derivatives therefor with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) content of more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; Providing a website featuring news and information in the field of business, consumer product information, economic information related to cannabis; Consulting services, in the field of business and business management, marketing, advertising and promotions, retail and wholesale sales | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by STANDARD EXTRACTS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by STANDARD EXTRACTS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 034
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named STANDARD EXTRACTS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 25, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 21, 2023 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2023 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2023 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2023 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 6, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2023 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Feb 3, 2023 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2023 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2023 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 23, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 10, 2022 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 30, 2022 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 9, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2022 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 14, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2021 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 11, 2021 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 11, 2021 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 27, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2021 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 24, 2020 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 14, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |