USPTO serial 90032236
EVERBLAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EVERBLAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SEAN L SWEENEY
SEAN L SWEENEY TREDECIM LLC91-J AUBURN STREET, #1133PORTLAND, ME 04103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewelry, namely, wedding rings and wedding bands | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 12, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 12, 2022 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 12, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 28, 2022 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 30, 2022 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 10, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 17, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 17, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |