Drawing for UNICENTER

USPTO serial 90072634

UNICENTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
POWERS, ALEXANDER L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNICENTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joan Rochman Esq.

Joan Rochman Esq. ROCHMAN SLUSSER LAW855 Via de la PazSuite 1Pacific Palisades, CA 90272

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Inventory management services that enable companies and organizations to search for and organize information on their IT assets so they may assess their network and application vulnerabilitiesACTIVE
042computer system analysis services for installation of computer systemsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 1, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 1, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 8, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 7, 2022EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 7, 2022AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Oct 8, 2022NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Oct 7, 2022TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Oct 7, 2022PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Oct 7, 2022PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Sep 29, 2022EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 31, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 29, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 1, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Feb 1, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 12, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Dec 29, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 27, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 27, 2021XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Dec 27, 2021GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Dec 27, 2021GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Dec 27, 2021CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 14, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jun 14, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 14, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 13, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 12, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 12, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 12, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 21, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 28, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance