USPTO serial 90076092
DR. AIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TERRELL, MARIESSA REBECCA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DR. AIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Gyeonggi-do, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. Joe Kim
B. Joe Kim GREER, BURNS & CRAIN LTD.300 S WACKER DRSUITE 2500CHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | protective anti-splash face masks for the prevention of accident or injury for non-medical purposes; gas masks for non-medical purposes; protective health face masks for the prevention of accident or injury for non-medical purposes; non-woven anti-pollution masks for non-medical purposes; season-less anti-pollution masks for cycling for non-medical purposes; protective children's face masks for the prevention of accident or injury for non-medical purposes; anti-eolian dust masks for children for non-medical purposes; protective hygienic face masks for the prevention of accident or injury not for medical purposes; protective disposable hygienic face masks for the prevention of accident or injury not for medical purposes; disposable hygienic anti-eolian dust masks for non-medical purposes; disposable dust masks for non-medical purposes; clean air masks, namely, anti-pollution masks for non-medical purposes; anti-eolian dust masks for non-medical purposes; and disposable anti-pollution masks for non-medical purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | sanitary masks for viral cold prevention; sanitary masks for dental use; sanitary cotton masks for protection against viral infection; sanitary health masks for protection against viral infection; non-woven sanitary masks for protection against viral infection; sanitary children's masks for protection against viral infection; sanitary hygienic masks for protection against viral infection; sanitary disposable hygienic masks for protection against viral infection; sanitary disposable masks for protection against viral infection; fashion masks being sanitary masks for protection against viral infection; fashion masks being sanitary masks for protection against viral infection containing a liner infused with herbal; ingredients; anti-bacterial sanitary masks for protection against viral infection | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 4, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 28, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 2, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |