USPTO serial 90118023
CALVERT SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 24, 2022
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six. Calendar Section 8 between years five and six, and consider trademark monitoring.
Need help with CALVERT SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Clint D. Cadwallader
Clint D. Cadwallader MCGRATH NORTH MULLIN & KRATZ, PC LLO1601 DODGE ST, SUITE 3700OMAHA, NE 68102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing training, education, and integrated learning services, namely, the design, development, and presentation of classes, seminars, workshops, exercises, and training of instructor services in the fields of flight operations, airplane flight instruction, airspace management, military flight operations, weapons, tactics, security, acquisition, procurement, logistics, and military services; providing training, education, and integrated learning services, namely, the design, development, and presentation of classes, seminars, workshops, exercises, and training of instructors for the United States military and federal agencies, all in the fields of aerospace, military, defense, intelligence, telecommunications, information technology, government contracting, and national security; assistance, advisory services and consultancy to the United States military and government agencies the field of aircrew training | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2022 | NRCS | NOTICE OF REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| May 24, 2022 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 14, 2022 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 12, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2022 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 11, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2022 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 16, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 21, 2022 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2022 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 30, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |