USPTO serial 90119643
OVATION HOLLYWOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 730Notice of Allowance
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TATE-NAGHI, JACQUELINE P
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
The USPTO has issued a Notice of Allowance. To complete registration you generally need to file a Statement of Use or an extension request before the deadline.
Need help with OVATION HOLLYWOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Notice of Allowance, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hollywood, CA, US
Hollywood, CA, US
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Hotel and restaurant services; Restaurant and bar services, including restaurant carryout services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2026 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2026 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2026 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 31, 2026 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2026 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 23, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2026 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 25, 2026 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 21, 2026 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2025 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 9, 2025 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 18, 2024 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 18, 2024 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 17, 2024 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 2024 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2024 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Jul 11, 2024 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 11, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2024 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Apr 8, 2024 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 27, 2024 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2024 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2024 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2024 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 29, 2024 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 22, 2023 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2023 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2023 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 24, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2023 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2023 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2023 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 8, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 3, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 2, 2022 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 1, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 2022 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 27, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 17, 2022 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2022 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 16, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 13, 2021 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2021 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2021 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jun 14, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2021 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 10, 2021 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Dec 14, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |