USPTO serial 90120095
YLPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 692
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with YLPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shenzhen KAIBOZE Technology Co., Ltd.
Futian Dist., Shenzhen, CN
Other trademarks owned by Shenzhen KAIBOZE Technology Co., Ltd.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Pliers; Scissors; Shovels; Spanners; Tweezers; Air pumps, hand-operated; Apparatus for tattooing; Beard clippers; Bits for hand drills; Curling tongs; Cuticle nippers; Depilation appliances, electric and non-electric; Egg slicers, non-electric; Eyelash curlers; Fingernail polishers, electric or non-electric; Gardening tools, namely, gardening shears and scissors; Hair clippers for personal use, electric and non-electric; Hair clippers for animals; Hand tools, namely, hammers; Hand tools, namely, stamps; Hand tools, namely, punches; Ice picks; Laser hair removal apparatus, other than for medical purposes; Lifting jacks, hand-operated; Mandolines; Manicure sets; Nail clippers, electric or non-electric; Nail files; Non-electric can openers; Pedicure sets; Pruning scissors; Razors, electric or non-electric; Screwdrivers, non-electric; Sharpening stones; Sterile body piercing instruments; Table knives, forks and spoons for babies; Tableware, namely, knives, forks and spoons; Tattoo needles; Bags and cases specially adapted for holding or carrying electric hair curling irons; Cattle shearers; Electric hair curling irons; Hand tools, namely, files; Hand tools, namely, graving tools; Hand tools, namely, manually-operated grindstones; Hand-operated cutting tools; Hand-operated milling cutters; Hand-operated vegetable peelers; Kitchen knives; Manual drills; Sport knives; Table cutlery | ACTIVE | Aug 15, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2022 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 3, 2022 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 22, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 30, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 28, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |