USPTO serial 90122408
L'MAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with L'MAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Valle del Cauca, CO
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair shampoos and conditioners; Hair sprays and hair gels; Hair straightening preparations; Hair styling preparations; Hair tonics; Hair wax; Hair styling spray | ACTIVE | Aug 18, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 7, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 7, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2023 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 6, 2023 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 22, 2023 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 18, 2023 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2023 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2023 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 15, 2023 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2023 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2023 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 14, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 9, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2022 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Feb 3, 2022 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 2, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 17, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |