Drawing for QUICK2CLAMP

USPTO serial 90180137

QUICK2CLAMP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUICK2CLAMP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID J. FORD

5725 INNOVATION DRIVETROY, MI 48098UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Clips, not of metal, for cables, pipe, tube and electrical conduit; Non-metal cable, pipe, tube and electrical conduit clamps; Non-metal clamps for positioning and supporting cable, pipe, and electrical conduit used in commercial and residential construction; all of the foregoing not for use with land vehiclesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2022MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jun 23, 2022ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jun 23, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
May 13, 2022EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Mar 2, 2022EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Mar 2, 2022EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Sep 2, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Sep 2, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 2, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 3, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 2, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 2, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 21, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 17, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance