USPTO serial 90182151
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Vancouver, BC, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Seong-Cheol Son
Seong-Cheol Son VOYER LAW134 ABBOTT STREET, SUITE 403VANCOUVER, BC, V6B2K4CANADA| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Massage apparatus; Massage apparatus for personal use; Massage apparatus, namely, hand-held personal massage apparatus and personal massage apparatus for intimate use and sexual stimulation; Electric massage appliances, namely, electric vibrating massagers; Adult sexual stimulation aids, namely, penis enlargers vibrators, dildos, penis sleeves, male masturbators; Adult stimulation aids, namely, artificial penises, artificial vaginas, penis rings, nipple clamps, dildos, anal plugs, penis sleeves, penis extensions, male masturbators, strap-on harnesses for dildos, prosthetic genitals, vagina exercisers, ball gags, ben wa balls and kegel balls; Condoms; Sex toys; Sex toys, namely, handcuffs, restraints and whips; Furniture especially made for sex purposes; Sex swings; Masturbation and sexual intercourse auxiliary devices, namely, artificial penises, penis enlargers, vibrators, ben wa balls, artificial vaginas and inflatable life-sized dolls used in sexual activity; Sex toys in the nature of edible underwear | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 27, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |