USPTO serial 90182509
THE VILLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE VILLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JACK A. WHEAT
JACK A. WHEAT MCBRAYER PLLC500 WEST JEFFERSON STREET, SUITE 2400LOUISVILLE, KY 40202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Education services in the nature of courses at the university level; Entertainment services in the nature of live musical and dramatic performances; Entertainment in the nature of competitions in the field of intercollegiate sports; Arranging and conducting educational conferences; Arranging, organizing, conducting, and hosting social entertainment events; Organization of exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes; Organizing and arranging exhibitions for entertainment purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 24, 2022 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Dec 17, 2021 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2021 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2021 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 12, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 12, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 12, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |