USPTO serial 90208909
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lekha Gopalakrishnan
Lekha Gopalakrishnan WINSTEAD PC2728 NORTH HARWOOD STREET, SUITE 500DALLAS, TX 75201UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | anaesthetic masks; masks for use by medical personnel; masks for use by veterinary medical personnel; facial masks for use by dental care providers; face masks for use by health care providers; sanitary masks for medical purposes; sanitary masks for medical wellness purposes; sanitary masks for virus isolation purposes; surgical masks; therapeutic facial masks; single-use masks for medical use, namely, protective face masks for medical use; facial masks, namely, protective face masks for medical use that filter at least 95% of airborne particles; respirator facial masks, namely, respiratory masks for medical purposes for protection against viral infection and bacterial infection that filter at least 95% of airborne particles; facial masks with replaceable filtration media for protection against viral infection and bacterial infection; protection masks with separate spunbond, meltblown fabrics for personal protection use sold as a unit, for medical use; filters for use in medical equipment, namely, air filters for medical ventilators, air filters for use in sanitary masks for protection against viral infection and bacterial infection; filters for use in medical environments, namely, air filters for medical ventilators, air filters for protection against viral infection and bacterial infection, and air filters for use in sanitary masks for protection against viral infection and bacterial infection | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | filters for water purification for personal protection, namely, for personal protection from viral infection and bacterial infection | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 9, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 9, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 8, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 12, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 11, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 14, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 14, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 25, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |