Drawing for OSMATIC

USPTO serial 90223261

OSMATIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 973
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DETMER, CAROLYN ROSE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OSMATIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey S. Firestone

275 SEVENTH AVENUE, 7TH FLOOR,NY, NY 10001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Cups; Pitchers; Bento boxes; Bottle openers; Cake moulds; Cutting boards for the kitchen; Dishwashing brushes; Electric toothbrushes; Flower pots; Make-up brushes; Pot cleaning brushes; Tooth brushes; Basting spoons; Clothes drying hangers; Cookware, namely, roasting pansACTIVEJul 10, 2020

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 14, 2022KSNSNOTICE OF SUSPENSION EMAILED - ADMIN REVIEW
Jan 21, 2022KSADSUSPENDED PENDING ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
Jan 10, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 10, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 10, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Aug 24, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Aug 24, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 24, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 23, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 22, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 22, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 23, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 12, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 2, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance