USPTO serial 90224879
YULOLOB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BECKER, JOSEPH RAPHAEL
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YULOLOB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chengdu, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey S. Firestone
275 SEVENTH AVENUE, 7TH FLOOR, 275 SEVENNEW YORK, NY 10001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Penknives; Scissors; Abrading tools; Apparatus for tattooing; Beard clippers; Bread knives; Ceramic knives; Cheese slicers, non-electric; Depilation appliances, electric and non-electric; Displacement pump sprayers attached to a garden hose for spraying liquid herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers and insecticides; Drawing knives; Ear piercing apparatus; Egg slicers, non-electric; Electric hair curling irons; Electric manicure sets; Eyelash curlers; Filleting knives; Fingernail polishers, electric or non-electric; Flat irons; Forks being tableware; Fruit knives; Gardening tools, namely, trowels, weeding forks, spades and hoes; Hair-removing tweezers; Hair clippers for personal use, electric and non-electric; Hand-operated agricultural implements, namely, broadforks; Hand-operated agricultural implements, namely, chicken pluckers; Hand-operated agricultural implements, namely, cider presses; Hand-operated caulking guns; Hand-operated cutting tools; Hand-operated lasts for shoemaking; Hand-operated riveting tools; Hand-operated sprayers for insecticides; Hand-operated tools, namely, chisels; Hand tools, namely, fruit pickers; Hand tools, namely, hand-operated pumps; Hand tools, namely, scrapers; Ice picks; Kitchen knives; Knife sharpeners; Knives being tableware; Manicure sets; Manually operated tree pruners; Nail clippers, electric or non-electric; Nail files; Non-electric caulking guns; Non-electric cheese slicers; Pedicure sets; Pizza cutters, non-electric; Razor blades; Razor cases; Razors, electric or non-electric; Scaling knives; Shaving cases; Shoe lasts being hand tools; Spoons being tableware; Table cutlery, namely, forks, spoons and knives; Table forks; Vegetable knives; Vegetable slicers; Whetstones | ACTIVE | Dec 15, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2022 | KSCO | SHOW CAUSE ORDER | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 8, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2021 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Feb 5, 2021 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |