Drawing for CIGARBROS

USPTO serial 90257581

CIGARBROS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RUSKIN, MATTHEW SEAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CIGARBROS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KARIMA GULICK

KARIMA GULICK INNOVENT LAW PC33 BROOKLINEALISO VIEJO, CA 92656UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
034HumidorsACTIVEJan 27, 2020

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 7, 2022MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Dec 7, 2022MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Dec 5, 2022ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Dec 5, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Oct 5, 2022EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Jul 12, 2022GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jul 12, 2022GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jul 12, 2022CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Jun 13, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 11, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 11, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 11, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jun 11, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 7, 2022EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jun 7, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jun 7, 2022EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jun 6, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Dec 6, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Dec 6, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 6, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 4, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 4, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 4, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 17, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 16, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 16, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 3, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 19, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance