USPTO serial 90262244
ETHICALLY SOURCED U.S.A.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TOOLEY, DAVID E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ETHICALLY SOURCED U.S.A.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Efstratios Camatsos
2 CLIFTON PARK AVENUELONDON, SW208BDUnited StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Foods and beverages | ACTIVE | Apr 21, 2024 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ethically Sourced Network Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Ethically Sourced Network Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class A
- Similar marks named ETHICALLY SOURCED U.S.A.
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2024 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2024 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2024 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2024 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2024 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| May 31, 2024 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2024 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2024 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2024 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2024 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2024 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 29, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 29, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 29, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 10, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2023 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2023 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 14, 2023 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2023 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 14, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2023 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2023 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 28, 2023 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2023 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 22, 2022 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2022 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2022 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2022 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 25, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 7, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2022 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2022 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 24, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 22, 2021 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2021 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 27, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 7, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2020 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |