USPTO serial 90271594
CLOSET SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EISNACH, MICHAEL PATRICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLOSET SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL N. COHEN
MICHAEL N. COHEN COHEN IP LAW GROUP, PC9025 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSUITE 301BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90211Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | On-line retail store services featuring cabinets, closets, storage products, entertainment centers; Retail store services featuring cabinets, closets, storage products, entertainment centers | ACTIVE | Dec 12, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 2, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 1, 2023 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 1, 2023 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 16, 2023 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 20, 2023 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2023 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2023 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 9, 2022 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2022 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2022 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 11, 2022 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 8, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |