USPTO serial 90276610
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARYANN E. LICCIARDI / REEMA PANGARKAR
MARYANN E. LICCIARDI / REEMA PANGARKAR COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C.114 WEST 47TH STREETNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for facilitating data accuracy using data validation, updates and predictive data; downloadable proprietary computer software for facilitating data accuracy using data validation, updates and predictive data | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing online non-downloadable computer software for facilitating data accuracy using data validation, updates and predictive data; providing online non-downloadable proprietary computer software for facilitating data accuracy using data validation, updates and predictive data | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2022 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 11, 2022 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2022 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 26, 2022 | EXDD | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED | — |
| May 19, 2022 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2022 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2022 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 24, 2022 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 28, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 1, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |