Drawing for BRIGHT STAR

USPTO serial 90283406

BRIGHT STAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMILLAN, CHRISTOPHER J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 122

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRIGHT STAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MAX MOSKOWITZ

MAX MOSKOWITZ OSTROLENK FABER LLP845 THIRD AVENUE, 8TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014JewelryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 9, 2025MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 8, 2025ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 8, 2025EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 16, 2025EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 11, 2025GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2025GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2025CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 23, 2024JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 23, 2024TTPRBOARD DECISION SET ASIDE; PROCEEDING REINSTATED—
Nov 5, 2024EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 10, 2024GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
May 10, 2024GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
May 10, 2024CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Apr 8, 2024JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 22, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 8, 2024JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 4, 2023EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 4, 2023EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 5, 2023GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 5, 2023GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 5, 2023CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 8, 2023RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 25, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 18, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 5, 2021GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2021GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2021CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 5, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 5, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 21, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance