USPTO serial 90303836
NEVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WOO, SAMUEL M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 136
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Georgetown, CA
Georgetown, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RUTH KHALSA
RUTH KHALSA THE IDEAS LAW FIRM, PLLC975 E DAVA DRIVETEMPE, AZ 85283UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics in the nature of eyelash growth serum; cosmetics in the nature of eyebrow growth serum | ABANDONED | Sep 24, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2022 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 16, 2022 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 16, 2022 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 1, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 9, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2022 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 26, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 1, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 1, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |