USPTO serial 90308425
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Haoyi Chen
HAOYI CHEN ARCH & LAKE LLP2500 WILCREST DR., SUITE 301HOUSTON, TX 77042UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Animal grooming gloves; Automatic pet feeding bowls; Cages for pets; Cleaning brushes for household use; Drinking troughs for animals; Electric pet brushes; Feeding troughs; Mangers for animals; Pet brushes; Pet drinking bowls; Pet feeding bowls, automatic; Pet feeding and drinking bowls; Pet litter boxes; Pet water bowls; Pet water fountains being dishes; Pet treat jars; Automatic pet waterers; Household storage containers for pet food; Racks and stands for elevating pet feeding bowls and dishes; Work gloves | ACTIVE | Sep 8, 2020 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 15, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 15, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2021 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |