Drawing for AOE

USPTO serial 90325505

AOE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
NELMAN, JESSE M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AOE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ruth Khalsa

Ruth Khalsa THE IDEAS LAW FIRM, PLLC975 E DAVA DRIVETEMPE, AZ 85283UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Screen protectors comprised of acrylic or tempered glass adapted for use with portable electronic devices; Computer peripherals; Electric charging cables for mobile phonesACTIVE
035Online retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer electronics, computer peripherals, and accessories for electronic devicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 31, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 29, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 1, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Feb 1, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 12, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Dec 28, 2021PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 27, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 27, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 27, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 22, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 20, 2021NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Dec 20, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 20, 2021PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Dec 20, 2021PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Nov 8, 2021MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 8, 2021ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 27, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 19, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 20, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance