CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for DOUBLE TUSK

USPTO serial 90351734

DOUBLE TUSK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RYDLAND, STEPHANIE DIANA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOUBLE TUSK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SAMANTHA N. SKAINS-MENCHACA

Samantha N. Skains-Menchaca MOORE & VAN ALLEN PLLC100 NORTH TRYON STREET, SUITE 4700CHARLOTTE, NC 28202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, except beer and wines, namely, Kentucky bourbon whiskey; Distilled spirits, namely, Kentucky bourbon whiskeyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 8, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2022ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 2, 2022ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 4, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 9, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 20, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 1, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 1, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2022EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 27, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 27, 2022EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 14, 2022GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jan 14, 2022GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2022CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 28, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 28, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 28, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 18, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 26, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 5, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance