USPTO serial 90379912
GEEGEE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCDORMAN, ROGER THOMAS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GEEGEE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yoon S. Ham
Yoon S. Ham HAUPTMAN HAM, LLP2318 MILL ROADSUITE 1400ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Communication Services, namely, electronic transmission of data and documents among users of computers; Providing on-line chat rooms and electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among users in the field of general interest; Providing electronic transmission of secure e-mail; Electronic data transmission; Electronic exchange of data stored in databases via telecommunication networks; Electronic message sending; Electronic message transmission; Information transmission via electronic communications networks; Provision of access to electronic sites; Communication by electronic computer terminals; Providing electronic telecommunication connections; Data communication by electronic mail; Electronic data interchange; Delivery of messages by electronic transmission; Transmission of information by electronic communications networks; Transmission of messages over electronic media; Providing private and secure real time electronic communication over a computer network; Electronic transmission of credit card transaction data and electronic payment data via a global computer network; Electronic transmission of messages and data; Electronic messaging services; Electronic transmission of mail and messages; Electronic transmission of messages; Electronic bulletin board services; Electronic messaging; Electronic transmission of information posted to usenet newsgroups and discussion groups via a global computer network; Electronic transmission of e-mail for game update newsletter, promotions, events; Transmission of electronic mail; Providing electronic transmission of contactless payment data via the internet; Providing on-line forums for transmission of messages among computer users; Providing an on-line forum for game discussion, feedback, player networking; Providing on-line forums for transmission of messages among computer users concerning gaming updates, feedback, future promotional events | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 9, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |