USPTO serial 90392670
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Long Island City, NY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew C. McElwee
Matthew C. McElwee RM LAW GROUP LLC161 N CLARKSTE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60601| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; Cosmetic nail preparations; Fingernail decals; Fingernail embellishments; Fingernail jewelry; Nail art pens; Nail art stickers; Nail cosmetics; Nail enamel; Nail enamels; Nail glitter; Nail polish; Nail polish base coat; Nail polish pens; Nail polish top coat; Nail varnish; Nail varnishes; Nail care kits comprising nail polish; Nail grooming products, namely, tips, glue, lacquer and glitter; Nail paint; Nail primer; Nail varnish for cosmetic purposes | PARTIALLY PAID | May 21, 2021 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 2021 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Jun 15, 2021 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2021 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2021 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 22, 2021 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 21, 2021 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |